Positive Politeness Strategies At Google Review Post Caption
Abstract
In the digital age, online platforms like Google Reviews have become significant spaces for individuals to express opinions and feedback. This study aims to investigate the linguistic and pragmatic aspects of positive politeness strategies utilized in the captions of these reviews. Positive politeness, a concept from politeness theory, involves linguistic strategies aimed at enhancing rapport and mitigating potential face-threatening acts. The research employs a qualitative approach, analyzing a diverse set of Google review post captions to identify prevalent positive politeness strategies. Through a detailed examination of linguistic features, such as lexical choices, syntactic structures, and discursive elements, the study seeks to unveil patterns and variations in the use of positive politeness. Additionally, the research delves into the socio-cultural context surrounding the reviews, considering factors that may influence language choices in this digital communication medium. By shedding light on the positive politeness strategies within Google review post captions, this study contributes to the broader field of pragmatics, offering insights into how individuals navigate politeness norms in the online domain. The findings may have implications for understanding online communication dynamics, customer feedback practices, and the role of positive politeness in shaping digital interactions within the context of review platforms like Google.
Downloads
References
Biber, Douglas and Finegan, Edward. 1994. Sociolinguistics Perspective on Register. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brown, Penelope and Steven C. Levinson. 1992. Politeness: Some Universal in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bousfield, Derek. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing, 2008.
Cutting, Joan. 2003. Pragmatics and Discourse: Resource Book for Student (London and New York: Routledge)
Creswhell, John W. 2003. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods. United States of America
Daniek, Novem. 2008. Register study used in Caving Devision. Surakarta: Thesis UMS: Unpublished.
Gioyoto, 2006. Grammar II. Surakarta: IAIN Surakarta Press
Holmes, Janet. 2002. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics. Endiburg: Person Education Limitted.
Ichsanto Fauzi. 2000. A Descriptive analysis of register used by prostitutes in Surakarta.
Jendra, Made Iwan Indrawan, 2010.Sociolinguistics: The study of Societies. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Leech, Geoffrey. 2003. Semantic (Translator: Paina Partana). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Pateda, Mansoer. 2002. Semantic Leksikal. Edisi Kedua. Bandung: Rinekacipta
Risna. 2009. A study on register used by Orayza FM Radio Community at the University of Brawijaya. Malang: Universitas of Brawijaya
Simatupang, E. C., Marwat, A., Aulia, N., Alfathan, D. F., Fathurrahman, & Alfan. (2020). An analysis of figurative language used in One Ok Rock “Eye of the Storm” album: Semantic study. Pjaee, 17(10), 3544–3549. https://archives.palarch.nl/index.php/jae/article/view/5843
Simatupang, E. C., & Supri, I. Z. (2020). Compound words that occur during the global pandemic Covid-19: A morphosemantic study. English Review: Journal of English Education, 8(2), 291-298.