Dekonstruksi Tokoh dalam Karya Sastra: Systematic Literature Review Perspektif Jacques Derrida

Abstract

This review compares research objects, uses of Jacques Derrida’s concepts, patterns of character deconstruction, and the limits of their supporting evidence. It audits 16 entries in the original corpus using manuscript summaries, publisher metadata, abstracts, and retrievable full-text sections. Twelve studies met the relevance criteria at the audit stage and four were excluded. Binary opposition was the most frequently identifiable concept in the material examined. The study of paternal authority in Di Tanah Lada illustrates how shifts in a signifier shape parent–child relations. Comparing cases helps distinguish conflicting character traits, hierarchies that depend on subordinated positions, and textual tensions that resist resolution. The authors propose a three-level framework for tracing identity categories, relational structures, and interpretive consequences. A methodological gap concerns the traceability of links between concepts, literary passages, and analytical conclusions. The framework may inform evidence-based reading tasks in Indonesian Language Education. The findings apply to the audited corpus, as records of the original screening remain incomplete